Plumbers NZ is New Zealand's largest online plumbing, gas and drainage resource. Plumbing exam help, plumbing news, directory and free quotes.

Author Topic: Fellow Practitioner Issue 213 dated 4 July 2014  (Read 2366 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Wal

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 572
  • Karma: +83/-0
Fellow Practitioner Issue 213 dated 4 July 2014
« on: July 04, 2014, 06:42:18 AM »
The Hon Dr Nick Smith is the new Minister of Building and Construction and this week two members of the Federation Executive met with him and a delegation of his advisors at the Beehive. This was very much a meet and greet meeting with the opportunity being given to the Federation to express its views and to listen to the Minister’s initial views.  Find out what happened.

Recruiting: To be able to affect change we need the industry to show a united front or have at least an industry organisation that has sufficient numbers to force change. If the change isn’t forthcoming we need to have sufficient numbers because being strong doesn’t always mean you have to fight the battle. True strength is being able to walk away from the nonsense with your head held high.

The Minister has accused the Federation of being negative. Obviously we don’t agree with that opinion – we see ourselves as being the “plumbers, gasfitters and drainlayers watchdog”.  Next week watch for an exciting announcement regarding an initiative to assist in the protection of the health and safety of the consumer, whilst also helping practitioners.


Linkback: https://www.plumbers.nz/fellow-practitioners-update/41/fellow-practitioner-issue-213-dated-4-july-2014/1712/

Offline Watchdog

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 214
  • Karma: +27/-1
  • Plumber gasfitter and drainlayer
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 213 dated 4 July 2014
« Reply #1 on: July 05, 2014, 08:35:11 AM »
Talking of Nick Smith I see on the news he is not happy with IPENZ (Institute Professional Engineers of NZ) and the fact that one of their members resigned before disciplinary action was taken against the individual.

Good on him because this isn't the first time this has happened. When Alan Bickers was the Chairman of the PGD Board and also an IPENZ member there was a similar incident where a individual (an IPENZ Member) was involved in an investigation being undertaken by the Board and that individual resigned from IPENZ before any action was taken. Perhaps this is so IPENZ can keep a clean record. 

Offline Badger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1981
  • Karma: +222/-151
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 213 dated 4 July 2014
« Reply #2 on: July 05, 2014, 09:17:19 AM »
Ironic I know Watchdog....I believe that might be in my witch hunt.

John Darnley (my old boss who all the evidence points to for an explosion) resigned from NZIGE (an arm of IPENZ) the very month after the explosion. The explosion nearly killed some one in early April 09 and he had resigned by the following May 09 News letter. Then Tony Hammond, another IPENZ member (actually an IPENZ award winning member) misrepresented and withheld evidence and shafted me.

I wonder if Stephen Parker (chair of my hearing/kangaroo court) and Tony Hammond (both also NZIGE members) have resigned/will resign? There may be more members but it is now difficult to gather info from the internet as it appears to have been restricted.....appears it must be either a club with secrets or a secret club?

Must be a protection built in to their little cabal, something like...... we'll protect you so far, but then you got to leave or perhaps the club comes first....lol.
You can't choose who you are.....but you are the sum of your choices.......

Offline robbo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1259
  • Karma: +83/-7
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 213 dated 4 July 2014
« Reply #3 on: July 05, 2014, 11:20:06 AM »
hi guys, i have always regarded Nick Smith highly and believe he is one of the more genuine members of parliament so i have hopes of good things from him regarding our trades peoples plight. However his views have obviously been contaminated by the previous minister so who knows what will happen. The other point is that he may not (hopefully) be the minister for that long after the election, cheers   

Offline Badger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1981
  • Karma: +222/-151
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 213 dated 4 July 2014
« Reply #4 on: July 05, 2014, 12:16:54 PM »
Have a look at point six in this letter by Nick Smith...........What has changed?

Offline Badger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1981
  • Karma: +222/-151
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 213 dated 4 July 2014
« Reply #5 on: July 05, 2014, 12:21:22 PM »
Point six in Mr Smiths own words says that in his opinion, that the explosion could have been averted if mine and Mr Smiths concerns had been heeded......in 2006.....three years before the explosion..........so what's changed..........nothing, the Board are still at it, the only thing to have changed is Mr Smiths opinion apparently.


Perhaps as a Doctor, he could help man the ambulance at the bottom of the cliff?

Offline robbo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1259
  • Karma: +83/-7
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 213 dated 4 July 2014
« Reply #6 on: July 05, 2014, 01:48:08 PM »
hi guys/Badger, so what happened? and what was the outcome? cheers

Offline Badger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1981
  • Karma: +222/-151
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 213 dated 4 July 2014
« Reply #7 on: July 05, 2014, 04:54:35 PM »
As far as the explosion, nothing other than making me the scapegoat.

The Board went and audited two jobs of nearly, if not all, the local gasfitters, making me a pariah in my area....when I had only complained about my old boss.

All charges laid against my old boss were found to have substance a 100% rate, but his charge at the exploding chip shop "disappeared".....so if he was responsible for the explosion, as I believe most if not all evidence points that way.....he blew some one up and got off with a $10 000 fine, and as he was already retired his "retraining" wasn't needed to up lift a licence. I was nearly 100% innocent and lost everything.

So a $10 000 get out of jail free card aint bad, eh? But then if you look at the explosion that that poor young girl who actually lost her life, it was even less and the Board did nothing? You can sign off 560 certs with 90% not to regulation and well over ten very dangerous...apparently still before the Board after 5 years.

Are these people worth the air they breath, I don't think so.

Offline robbo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1259
  • Karma: +83/-7
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 213 dated 4 July 2014
« Reply #8 on: July 06, 2014, 07:10:56 PM »
hi guys/badger, so what happened when Nick smith wrote to Associate minister Patsy Wong? did`nt the hon P.Wong resign not long after that?!!! cheers 

Offline Badger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1981
  • Karma: +222/-151
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 213 dated 4 July 2014
« Reply #9 on: July 06, 2014, 08:24:25 PM »
Pretty much mate

Offline robbo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1259
  • Karma: +83/-7
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 213 dated 4 July 2014
« Reply #10 on: July 06, 2014, 10:33:45 PM »
hi guys, some notes from the auditor general.
...Auditor-General’s overview
The work of the Board is important (debatable) through its registration and licensing processes, it controls entry to the plumbing, gasfitting, and drainlaying trades. Effective regulation of these trades is important for public safety (maybe where is the proof) these trades are also important economically because they are necessary for an effective building and construction industry. Equally, the Board’s decisions are important for the people who need licences to be able to work, and for the businesses that employ them.
There is no doubt that the costs of regulation fall heavier on the group of trades that the Board regulates than some other regulated workers. The Board regulates a much smaller number of tradespeople than, for example, the Electrical Workers Registration Board or the Building Practitioners Board. It is entirely funded by tradespeople, and it has a unique role in prosecuting unregistered and unlicensed people carrying out unlawful work. The result is that costs to plumbers, gasfitters, and drainlayers are higher than the costs for some other tradespeople.

Offline integrated

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 412
  • Karma: +37/-2
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 213 dated 4 July 2014
« Reply #11 on: July 07, 2014, 03:38:29 PM »
Effective regulation of these trades is important for public safety


If this was truly the case it would be a requirement to be registered & licensed to undertake civil works, IE water main and sewer/storm - which as far as I am aware it is not?

I will gladly stand corrected

Imagine the revenue generated if all civil contractors had to be registered & licensed also...

Offline Enn

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 192
  • Karma: +22/-1
  • Ex-chef
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 213 dated 4 July 2014
« Reply #12 on: July 07, 2014, 10:57:00 PM »
Intergrated the short version,
 As I'm aware you do not have to have a licence/qualification to work on / install watermains even tho it is a potable water supply, if designed by a engineer.
I was to get involved with a dept of health funded town water supply upgrade, 150mm PVC  pumped from a well in the river bed  to supply tanks that then gravity fed to the town with a ring main for fire hydrants.
I arrived on site to find the project manager had laid 500 meters of pipe and covered it.
no testing, no compaction,poor bedding material and of insufficient amount, had not torqued the gibault fittings and no knowlege of this even tho the fittings come with a tag attached with instructions, little attempt at thrust blocks, poor traffic management, the list goes on.
I left when there was almost a argument with the engineer about fitting the pumps with a mac union or some means of decoupling for future maintenance and wrapping the galvanised pipe that was to be buried with denso tape or some protection.
I was quite shocked that even assets and management had no worries about it at all.

I was quite angry given the crap we have to put up with just to ply our trade and here is a monkey doing a 750k job with no ticket, licence or experience.

I doubt he will have any liability either, my parting comment was i thought he had big balls and no brain.

To be honest it made me think about other avenues of work. unfortunately for me plumbing is a disease not a career.




''Never have so many been fooled by so few''
Plumbing is not a career it is a disease....

Offline integrated

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 412
  • Karma: +37/-2
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 213 dated 4 July 2014
« Reply #13 on: July 08, 2014, 10:54:12 PM »
I agree Enn - it seems to be another one of those things that beggars belief & just doesn't really make any good common sense


I always wondered how lucrative it would be contracting to civil - maybe it is not and hence all the short cuts taken.


Share via digg Share via facebook Share via linkedin Share via twitter

Similar Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies / Views Last post
clip
Fellow Practitioner Issue 214 dated 11 July 2014

Started by Wal

3 Replies
991 Views
Last post July 17, 2014, 11:49:45 AM
by Plumber
clip
Fellow Practitioner Issue 215 dated 18 July 2014

Started by Wal

0 Replies
608 Views
Last post July 18, 2014, 06:24:52 AM
by Wal
clip
Fellow Practitioner Issue 216 dated 25 July 2014

Started by Wal

4 Replies
1340 Views
Last post July 25, 2014, 07:12:54 PM
by Badger
clip
Fellow Practitioner Issue 108 Dated 6 July 2012

Started by Wal

0 Replies
1162 Views
Last post July 06, 2012, 06:26:31 AM
by Wal
 
Share this topic...
In a forum
(BBCode)
In a site/blog
(HTML)